i didn't mention it yesterday, but boxers and thongs peeping out of someone's pants annoys me. i don't understand how people can comfortably wear their pants so low that their underwear is exposed at all times. the whole baggy pants thing with guys, i just don't see its purpose. i've had guys on my track team in high school wear their warm-ups so loose that they had to hold them up when they jogged around the track. why? its not attractive and its not efficient. every day at lunch we probably observe at least three girls who have their thong riding up out of their pants because their jeans are so low. and they're always some kind of vanity panties that spell out "foxy" or "sexy" or something rather in jewels. obviously, the underwear companies intend for them to stick out... i can't believe girls are actually willing to buy underwear that is meant to do so. underwear is meant to be worn under clothes... i guess people have lost sight of that concept.
its about some time legislators took action on the "droopy drawers" problem.
its kinda odd that they're trying to fine people who expose their underwear...that just seems weird. but i'm glad to see that someone is trying to discourage it. its quite a stretch on the underwear companies part to claim that exposed undies is a form of "freedom of speech"... i doubt the founders had this in mind when they were writing the constitution.... it was provocative to expose one's ankles in that age. but crumbalas, $100 worth of free underwear from the companies if you get fined for exposing your undergarments...we might be seeing more underwear than ever...
Thursday, March 03, 2005
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
hey, if i got free underwear i'd show mine. i hate buying underwear. seems a waste when no one ever sees it.
that's scandalous kait!
Post a Comment